The Copykat - A Copyright Infringement Oriented Week!

This CopyKat yesteryear Lolita Huber-Froment

Let’s start with a videogame, shall we?

Many of you lot cause got already heard close League of Legends, a MOBA (Multiplayer Online Battle Arena) extremely famous inwards the videogame world. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 lot of tournaments based on this game are organised each year, as well as its reputation spans America. And who says fame, says copyright infringement. 

A Chinese video game studio is currently defendant of making a real like version of League of Legends!

From the characters to the map, everything is real similar! Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 written report took an instance of i of the most prominent figure of the game, the immature daughter “Annie”. And equally you lot encounter below, well, it seems real clear doesn’t it?

The possessor of League of Legends, Riot Games, has sued the Chinese companionship inwards the federal courtroom inwards Los Angeles for copyright as well as trademark infringement. And presently nosotros volition encounter how this battle is going to end!

Forever 21, in i lawsuit to a greater extent than as well as again!

Forever 21 is in i lawsuit once to a greater extent than beingness sued yesteryear Mara Hoffman for copying i of her master prints. According to it’s complaint, Forever 21 infringed her copyright-protected “Leaf” textile print.

The electrical load is equally follow: according to Mara Hoffman, Forever 21 ““infringed [its] copyright yesteryear manufacturing, importing, displaying, distributing, selling, offering for sale, promoting as well as advertising women’s swimwear which exploit, piece of occupation or otherwise contain a pattern unlawfully taken from Mara Hoffman’s copyrighted work.”

And apparently, it’s non the offset time! Mara Hoffman said that she has been the target of Forever 21 inwards the past: inwards 2012 as well as inwards 2013.

She is seeking for monetary damages inwards connectedness alongside the alleged copyright infringement.

The case: Mara Hoffman, Inc. v. Forever 21, Inc., 1:17-cv-05393 (SDNY). 

“Reproduction” of an master work

A lawsuit filed inwards New York this calendar week has at view a quite complicated question: how much tin you lot conserve an artwork earlier it becomes something alone different?

Cady Noland claims that a conservator has been paid to repair her sculpture Log Cabin without consulting her. By “repair”, she claims that it was agency beyond the bounds of normal conservation.

According to her, this reparation is then dissimilar from the master piece of occupation that it became a re-create of her work. For her, the conservator destroyed the master piece of occupation as well as created an unauthorized reproduction. According to the law, this is copyright infringement – yes, again!